Open source project

JCP: the Jung Compression Project

Two separate goals, one source: Jung's own definitions.

v0.3 Work in progress CC BY-SA 4.0 + MIT

Goals

A

A formal language for Jung's dictionary

Turn CW6's Dictionary of Analytical Psychology into JFL: one record per term, defined before use, checkable by machine.

Boundary: That chapter. Nothing else in CW6, nothing from outside it.

B

Link Jung's typology to current science

Two attitudes and four functions, as Jung defined them, converted term by term to constructs science can measure, with each fit stated.

Boundary: Six constructs only. Jung, not MBTI: no 16 types, no letters, no stacks.

Two goals, not two stages. Neither waits on the other.

Principles

1
Strict Jung definitions. Jung's definition governs, including where the modern word has drifted. Anything JCP adds is said out loud, never smuggled in.
2
Introversion and extraversion are Jung's. Direction of libidoᴶ, toward object or subject. Big Five extraversion is a different construct that borrowed the word. Translation, never a contest.
3
Filled gaps are marked. A raised ᴮ = added by JCP, with a record of what was missing. A raised ᴶ = false friend (feelingᴶ is valuation, not emotion).
4
A polarity, answered per situation. T/F, S/N and I/E are single axes, as Jung has them. But you answer per situation, and both and neither are real answers.
5
The output is a range, not a letter. A box per polarity: middle = tendency, width = how much the situation moves you, overlap with the other pole = the part nobody ever shows.

Scopes and outputs

Scope 1

Typology

2 attitudes, 4 functions
Planned
Paper. The six converted outward: citation, fit, gaps both ways.
Seed
Article. Same argument, readable. Seed exists, to be rewritten.
Live
Jung Range. The test. All 8 function-attitudes measured separately, four answers per item (either pole, both, neither), nothing leaves your browser. Being reworked: no type code, no MBTI stack, ranges out.
Scope 2

JFL

CW6 Dictionary of Analytical Psychology only
Draft
Paper. Formalising a natural-language theory without smuggling modern constructs in.
Live
Article: the spec. The notation and the closure rules.
Live
Article: Jung for Humans. The same system, zero notation.

Where it stands

  • JFL: 84 term records under a closure linter, 28 of them anchored to a named Dictionary entry. Roughly half the chapter.
  • Typology links: 10 conversions and 3 declared gaps in the repo, now being re-checked against the six constructs.
  • Jung Range measures the eight function-attitudes the right way, then collapses them into a four-letter code at the last step. The code and the borrowed stack come out; the ranges go in.
  • Withdrawn: the old typology test (it administered a Big Five item bank), the observer swap, and the old epub.

Not in scope

  • ×MBTI, the 16 types, function stacks as categories.
  • ×Ranking Jung against the Big Five, or against anything.
  • ×CW6 outside the Dictionary chapter, for the language.
  • ×Collecting anyone's responses. Instruments store nothing.
Open source. Text CC BY-SA 4.0, code MIT. Nothing gated, nothing for sale. Back to home